And 5 is hardly bleeding edge at this point.
Just been reading material on the docbook website which suggests 4.x is end of life. I also have no great knowledge of docbook so I guess for that reason, also no really compelling reason to move to 5. On Wed, at 5:02 PM, Lars Helge Øverland > wrote: Just wanted to note that I personally have found XML Mind more suitable and faster than Serna Free, and it is good in that it readily displays the path to resources like images.Ĩ Jason Pickering do not have a strong opinion about which version to use, mostly out Post to : : DHIS 2 developers in LaunchpadĪgree with being practical - which probably means old-fashioned in this case, unless there are very compelling features in version 5. Mailing list: DHIS 2 developers in Launchpad On Wed, at 5:02 PM, Lars Helge Øverland wrote:ĭen 18. Unless there are other reasons, I think we should tread softly, and The building on the documentation on my side (working over an The changes Jo has made to the pom are great and significantly ease Something that is perhaps not bleeding edge, but practical. Use VI for editing DocBook, it would make sense to stick with Requirements to have a somewhat more streamlined set of documents, theĮditors that are practical for both geeks and those less inclined to There could be compelling reasons to use a later version of the
The WYSIWYG editor, Serna Free, which support version 4.2 out of theīox. Recommendation of using version 4.x is based on what is available with Small subset (at the moment) of the total number of DocBook tags, so IĪm not 100% about whether we need to be on the bleeding edge. Of ignorance, but somewhat based on practicality. I do not have a strong opinion about which version to use, mostly out
0 kommentar(er)
